By Ryan in Feedback • Published on November 12th, 2024
Update: Minutes after publishing this article a game update was pushed, adding a rule that multiboxing is no longer allowed in Brighter Shores. What a coincidence!
Brighter Shores has stirred up a storm within its community over a contentious topic: multiboxing. This gameplay style, where one player uses multiple accounts to play the game simultaneously, has ignited debate on Reddit and other platforms, with players passionately divided over whether multiboxing is fair or if it undermines the game's integrity. As the practice grows more visible in Brighter Shores, many players demand that the game developers take a stance and prohibit it, citing concerns over balance, economy, and competition. Let's examine the arguments on both sides of this debate and consider what multiboxing might mean for Brighter Shores in the long run.
Multiboxing is when a single player logs into multiple game accounts simultaneously. Some players accomplish this by running separate instances of the game on different computers, while others may use software like Sandboxie-Plus or ISBoxer to simulate multiple game windows on one machine. This approach can allow players to control multiple characters, gather resources, and participate in PvP and other content with a significant advantage over single-account players. Although some multiboxers manually control each character, even without automation, they can leverage extra characters to gain more loot, resources, or control in competitive elements of the game.
Many Brighter Shores players argue that multiboxing gives certain individuals an undue advantage, which ultimately harms the community and disrupts gameplay balance. Here are the main points of concern voiced by these players:
Unfair Competitive Edge: Multiboxers often outpace other players in progression and resource gathering, allowing them to funnel their rewards into a primary account and dominate the leaderboards. This advantage is seen as inherently unfair to players who can only play one account at a time.
Pressure on Other Players: Players who choose not to multibox can feel pressured to do so to keep up with the competition. Without restrictions, some argue, Brighter Shores may evolve into a game that implicitly requires multiboxing for progression, creating a "pay-to-win" atmosphere where success hinges on one's ability to run multiple accounts.
Economic Disruption: Critics highlight that multiboxing can flood the in-game market with resources and items, driving down prices and hurting single-account players' ability to make in-game currency. With more resources entering the economy through multiboxing, items become less valuable, potentially affecting the game's entire economy and progression systems.
Long-Term Game Design Issues: Some players worry that if multiboxing becomes widespread, Brighter Shores developers might design future content around it, leading to gameplay and progression systems that cater to multiboxers and alienate solo players. This, they claim, has happened in other games like EVE Online, where certain activities, like mining or territory control, are nearly impossible without multiboxing.
Use of Third-Party Software: A particularly heated aspect of the debate is the use of third-party software, like Sandboxie-Plus, which enables multiboxing on a single computer. Many argue this practice violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the game's terms of service (ToS). They call on the developers to explicitly ban such software, as it offers players an efficient way to control multiple accounts and gain advantages that would otherwise be unattainable for single-account players.
On the other side, there are players who argue that multiboxing, especially when done without automation software, is a legitimate and harmless playstyle. Here are the main points made by those defending multiboxing:
Manual Input Justifies Effort: Some players contend that as long as each account is manually controlled, there's no unfair automation at play. For these players, multiboxing is just a more intense way of engaging with the game, requiring dedication and patience. They argue that controlling multiple accounts simultaneously is a skill and that the rewards are well-earned given the effort involved.
No Direct Harm to Other Players: Multiboxing proponents note that many of the arguments against the practice are hypothetical. They argue that in Brighter Shores, resources and instances aren't inherently blocked by the presence of multiboxers, so other players can still gather items at their own pace without direct interference. As such, they argue that multiboxing does not directly harm the gameplay experience of single-account players.
Choice and Investment: Multiboxing requires players to invest significantly more money and time in the game, making it a matter of personal choice. Some believe that prohibiting multiboxing would unfairly restrict players' freedom and penalize those who wish to support the game by paying for multiple accounts. They see multiboxing as a valid strategy, arguing that as long as players abide by the ToS, they should be free to play as they wish.
Similar to Hardcore Grinding: Supporters also argue that the advantages gained from multiboxing are not fundamentally different from those gained by players who grind for long hours on a single account. They say that just as hardcore players naturally progress faster than casual ones, multiboxing rewards those who are willing to put in extra effort.
Suggestions for Compromise: Some defenders propose a middle ground, suggesting that Brighter Shores could restrict certain aspects of multiboxing, such as trading between accounts, instead of banning it outright. For example, banning self-trading would prevent players from funneling resources between accounts, addressing the perceived imbalance while allowing people to play multiple accounts independently.
The debate over multiboxing brings to light several questions about how Brighter Shores should handle the issue of fairness, competition, and game balance. It also raises the larger question of developer responsibility, as many players argue that the game's current ToS lacks clarity on multiboxing and third-party software.
Brighter Shores players seem to agree on one thing: the game's developers must address this issue decisively, whether by implementing restrictions or by clarifying that multiboxing is allowed. Some players call for an explicit ToS update banning third-party software like Sandboxie-Plus, while others suggest that multiboxing should be allowed but with limits to ensure it doesn't undermine the game's core values of fair play and competition.
As Brighter Shores moves out of early access and into a fully released title, multiboxing will likely remain a hot topic. For now, the community is divided. Opponents fear that unchecked multiboxing could damage the game's economy and push players toward practices that could lead to pay-to-win gameplay. Supporters, however, see it as a valid way to engage more deeply with the game, as long as it is done within the ToS.
The developers face a critical decision: whether to enforce limits on multiboxing to preserve balance or to accommodate multiboxers who contribute financially to the game. Either way, how Brighter Shores handles multiboxing may significantly shape its future player base, economy, and competitive landscape.
Embark on a shared journey through the magical realms of Brighter Shores with our fansite, a community hub where adventurers gather to exchange secrets, strategies, and stories from the award-winning MMORPG designed by Andrew Gower, offering a world of enchantment, mystery, and endless exploration at your fingertips.
This site is a fan-made resource dedicated to Brighter Shores and is not affiliated with Fen Research or the official development team of Brighter Shores in any way. We provide news, guides, and tools purely for the enjoyment and benefit of the game's community. All content is created by fans for fans.
